websecurity@lists.webappsec.org

The Web Security Mailing List

View all threads

Re: [WEB SECURITY] Opinions on Burp Suite Web App Scanner

AJ
Arian J. Evans
Wed, Oct 12, 2011 5:24 PM

It is the best product you will find for $300. It's probably the most
widely used testing proxy today, and I highly recommend it for what it
is. As for the crawler, that all depends on your websites. Go
benchmark it on Wivet if you want synthetic metrics, but all that
really matters are how a given crawler works on your own websites.

For pure automation Netsparker is also cheap. Not useful for my needs,
but consultancies that do limited scanner-jockey work on the DAST side
of things get by with it.

Also the SF pen-test list is dead for modern appsec PT talk. I
recommend the OWASP or WASC lists. In fact, I bet this bounces from
the SF PT list because the admins still can't figure out how to deal
with gmail forwards on 40% of the SF lists. </amateur>

I've CC'd the WASC list for you. The Denizens can chime in,


Arian Evans
Software Security Scanner Sophisticate

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Derrenbacker,  L. Jonathan
JDerrenbacker@kshgs.com wrote:

I have budget for a web app vulnerability scanner, and I was wondering if anyone has opinions on the professional version Burp Suite with the scanner option.
Is the scanner any good? Accurate?

This is the website if anyone doesn't know what it is:
http://portswigger.net/burp/scanner.html

Thanks,
Jon


This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board

Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified.

http://www.iacertification.org

It is the best product you will find for $300. It's probably the most widely used testing proxy today, and I highly recommend it for what it is. As for the crawler, that all depends on your websites. Go benchmark it on Wivet if you want synthetic metrics, but all that really matters are how a given crawler works on your own websites. For pure automation Netsparker is also cheap. Not useful for my needs, but consultancies that do limited scanner-jockey work on the DAST side of things get by with it. Also the SF pen-test list is dead for modern appsec PT talk. I recommend the OWASP or WASC lists. In fact, I bet this bounces from the SF PT list because the admins still can't figure out how to deal with gmail forwards on 40% of the SF lists. </amateur> I've CC'd the WASC list for you. The Denizens can chime in, --- Arian Evans Software Security Scanner Sophisticate On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan <JDerrenbacker@kshgs.com> wrote: > I have budget for a web app vulnerability scanner, and I was wondering if anyone has opinions on the professional version Burp Suite with the scanner option. > Is the scanner any good? Accurate? > > This is the website if anyone doesn't know what it is: > http://portswigger.net/burp/scanner.html > > > > Thanks, > Jon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board > > Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified. > > http://www.iacertification.org > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
F
firebits
Thu, Oct 20, 2011 12:32 PM

There is a project that automates, passive analysis made ​​by Burp.

The Creator is the Wagner Elias, is an opensource project, done in Brazil.

http://wagnerelias.com/2011/10/18/webfight-automatizando-a-analise-passiva-de-aplicacoes-web/

@firebitsbr

2011/10/12 Arian J. Evans arian.evans@anachronic.com

It is the best product you will find for $300. It's probably the most
widely used testing proxy today, and I highly recommend it for what it
is. As for the crawler, that all depends on your websites. Go
benchmark it on Wivet if you want synthetic metrics, but all that
really matters are how a given crawler works on your own websites.

For pure automation Netsparker is also cheap. Not useful for my needs,
but consultancies that do limited scanner-jockey work on the DAST side
of things get by with it.

Also the SF pen-test list is dead for modern appsec PT talk. I
recommend the OWASP or WASC lists. In fact, I bet this bounces from
the SF PT list because the admins still can't figure out how to deal
with gmail forwards on 40% of the SF lists. </amateur>

I've CC'd the WASC list for you. The Denizens can chime in,


Arian Evans
Software Security Scanner Sophisticate

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Derrenbacker,  L. Jonathan
JDerrenbacker@kshgs.com wrote:

I have budget for a web app vulnerability scanner, and I was wondering if

anyone has opinions on the professional version Burp Suite with the scanner
option.

Is the scanner any good? Accurate?

This is the website if anyone doesn't know what it is:
http://portswigger.net/burp/scanner.html

Thanks,
Jon


This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review

Board

Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can

actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a
full practical examination in order to become certified.

There is a project that automates, passive analysis made ​​by Burp. The Creator is the Wagner Elias, is an opensource project, done in Brazil. http://wagnerelias.com/2011/10/18/webfight-automatizando-a-analise-passiva-de-aplicacoes-web/ @firebitsbr 2011/10/12 Arian J. Evans <arian.evans@anachronic.com> > It is the best product you will find for $300. It's probably the most > widely used testing proxy today, and I highly recommend it for what it > is. As for the crawler, that all depends on your websites. Go > benchmark it on Wivet if you want synthetic metrics, but all that > really matters are how a given crawler works on your own websites. > > For pure automation Netsparker is also cheap. Not useful for my needs, > but consultancies that do limited scanner-jockey work on the DAST side > of things get by with it. > > Also the SF pen-test list is dead for modern appsec PT talk. I > recommend the OWASP or WASC lists. In fact, I bet this bounces from > the SF PT list because the admins still can't figure out how to deal > with gmail forwards on 40% of the SF lists. </amateur> > > I've CC'd the WASC list for you. The Denizens can chime in, > > --- > Arian Evans > Software Security Scanner Sophisticate > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan > <JDerrenbacker@kshgs.com> wrote: > > I have budget for a web app vulnerability scanner, and I was wondering if > anyone has opinions on the professional version Burp Suite with the scanner > option. > > Is the scanner any good? Accurate? > > > > This is the website if anyone doesn't know what it is: > > http://portswigger.net/burp/scanner.html > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Jon > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review > Board > > > > Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can > actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a > full practical examination in order to become certified. > > > > http://www.iacertification.org > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > The Web Security Mailing List > > WebSecurity RSS Feed > http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss > > Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA > > WASC on Twitter > http://twitter.com/wascupdates > > websecurity@lists.webappsec.org > http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org >