All, We are finally ready to go.... After all those months of work, debate, research, writing and editing, the SATEC project is ready to go. I am very proud to have worked on this with every one of you and looking forward to have the world enjoy what we collectively have been working on for the past 19 months It is time to start making a buzz about it, let's make the world see what we have been working on for 19 months. Blog, tweet, facebook, etc about it and make it as visible as you possibly could, I have created a new hashtag for it #satecbywasc, please use it. Here is the link to the new criteria page http://projects.webappsec.org/w/page/66094278/Static%20Analysis%20Technologies%20Evaluation%20Criteria Regards, Sherif

On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:00:46PM -0400, Sherif Koussa wrote: > All, > > We are finally ready to go.... > > After all those months of work, debate, research, writing and editing, the > SATEC project is ready to go. > > I am very proud to have worked on this with every one of you and looking > forward to have the world enjoy what we collectively have been working on > for the past 19 months > > It is time to start making a buzz about it, let's make the world see what > we have been working on for 19 months. Blog, tweet, facebook, etc about it > and make it as visible as you possibly could, I have created a new hashtag > for it #satecbywasc, please use it. > > Here is the link to the new criteria page > http://projects.webappsec.org/w/page/66094278/Static%20Analysis%20Technologies%20Evaluation%20Criteria > > Regards, > Sherif I'm not happy that I got removed from contributors-list right before this document got published. Is this normal in WASC-projects? I used hours to this project by reviewing and giving comments (as requested). Most definitely I did not contribute the most, but still very questionable for project like this. Well at least the document looks good! --- Henri Salo

I can't speak to your individual contributions, but speaking from the wasc perspective, it is up to the project leader to determine the level of contribution from their team, and how it will be represented. Regards, Robert Auger WASC Offier On Thu, 16 May 2013, Henri Salo wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:00:46PM -0400, Sherif Koussa wrote: >> All, >> >> We are finally ready to go.... >> >> After all those months of work, debate, research, writing and editing, the >> SATEC project is ready to go. >> >> I am very proud to have worked on this with every one of you and looking >> forward to have the world enjoy what we collectively have been working on >> for the past 19 months >> >> It is time to start making a buzz about it, let's make the world see what >> we have been working on for 19 months. Blog, tweet, facebook, etc about it >> and make it as visible as you possibly could, I have created a new hashtag >> for it #satecbywasc, please use it. >> >> Here is the link to the new criteria page >> http://projects.webappsec.org/w/page/66094278/Static%20Analysis%20Technologies%20Evaluation%20Criteria >> >> Regards, >> Sherif > > I'm not happy that I got removed from contributors-list right before this > document got published. Is this normal in WASC-projects? I used hours to this > project by reviewing and giving comments (as requested). Most definitely I did > not contribute the most, but still very questionable for project like this. > > Well at least the document looks good! > > --- > Henri Salo > > _______________________________________________ > wasc-satec mailing list > wasc-satec@lists.webappsec.org > http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/wasc-satec_lists.webappsec.org >

Hi Henri, Per my email to you on May 10th, please send me a list with your contributions in order to be able to add you to the list. Regards, Sherif On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Henri Salo <henri@nerv.fi> wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:00:46PM -0400, Sherif Koussa wrote: > > All, > > > > We are finally ready to go.... > > > > After all those months of work, debate, research, writing and editing, > the > > SATEC project is ready to go. > > > > I am very proud to have worked on this with every one of you and looking > > forward to have the world enjoy what we collectively have been working on > > for the past 19 months > > > > It is time to start making a buzz about it, let's make the world see what > > we have been working on for 19 months. Blog, tweet, facebook, etc about > it > > and make it as visible as you possibly could, I have created a new > hashtag > > for it #satecbywasc, please use it. > > > > Here is the link to the new criteria page > > > http://projects.webappsec.org/w/page/66094278/Static%20Analysis%20Technologies%20Evaluation%20Criteria > > > > Regards, > > Sherif > > I'm not happy that I got removed from contributors-list right before this > document got published. Is this normal in WASC-projects? I used hours to > this > project by reviewing and giving comments (as requested). Most definitely I > did > not contribute the most, but still very questionable for project like this. > > Well at least the document looks good! > > --- > Henri Salo > > _______________________________________________ > wasc-satec mailing list > wasc-satec@lists.webappsec.org > http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/wasc-satec_lists.webappsec.org >