All, I have the following comments related to Section 2 of WAFEC v1.0 i.e. pp7-10 based on a very quick rereading (i.e. I could be wrong) - What should be considered for HTML 5 based on the existing sub heading within Section 2 WAFEC v1.0? - What heading should be added to Section for HTML 5 to Section 2 for WAFEC v2.0? In relation to the specific subsections for Section 2 WAFEC v1.0: 2.2 - Can the common technical encoding types be specified e.g. "Content-Encoding: gzip" as examples to allow for new encoding types to be "assumed" based on generic wording, etc after the publication of WAFEC v2.0? 2.8 - Should this be relabeled as "Data Leak Prevention" within WAFEC v2.0? -- Regards, Christian Heinrich http://www.linkedin.com/in/ChristianHeinrich Mobile: +61 433 510 532 (AEST +10 GMT/UTC) SkypeID: cmlh.id.au

2.8 - I used the wrong term, should be "Data Loss Prevention" i.e. not "Leak" On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Christian Heinrich <christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote: > All, > > I have the following comments related to Section 2 of WAFEC v1.0 i.e. > pp7-10 based on a very quick rereading (i.e. I could be wrong) > > - What should be considered for HTML 5 based on the existing sub > heading within Section 2 WAFEC v1.0? > > - What heading should be added to Section for HTML 5 to Section 2 for > WAFEC v2.0? > > > In relation to the specific subsections for Section 2 WAFEC v1.0: > >   2.2 - Can the common technical encoding types be specified e.g. > "Content-Encoding: gzip" as examples to allow for new encoding types > to be "assumed" based on generic wording, etc after the publication of > WAFEC v2.0? >   2.8 - Should this be relabeled as "Data Leak Prevention" within WAFEC v2.0? -- Regards, Christian Heinrich http://www.linkedin.com/in/ChristianHeinrich Mobile: +61 433 510 532 (AEST +10 GMT/UTC) SkypeID: cmlh.id.au