[WEB SECURITY] Exploiting User-Agent XSS
Mike.Duncan at noaa.gov
Tue May 31 10:11:16 EDT 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
For inline proxying, you could look to any number of places (Google for
starters). Most of them start with arp poisoning, making your machine
the gateway/proxy for the subnet. Afterward, start up SQUID and a way
you go. Not much to it really -- but requires access to the
For wireless networks, needless-to-say you need access to the network
either by SE, cracking the key, or just using a known key.
Unfortunately, if you have no access to the network/subnet or if the
router/switches are blocking ARP poison attempts, you are left with SE
or some other vector. This is what I mentioned in my last message.
Application Security Specialist
US Government Contractor, STG Inc.
NOAA National Climatic Data Center
Information Technology Security (ITS)
On 05/29/11 08:35, Rohit Pitke wrote:
> That is correct. I am saying, is this possibility worked out anywhere? I
> am looking for some research papers/work done on it. I see it as bleak
> exploitation scenario still wondering.
> *From:* Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf at coredump.cx>
> *To:* Rohit Pitke <rohirp92 at yahoo.com>
> *Cc:* Mike Duncan <Mike.Duncan at noaa.gov>; Atul Agarwal
> <atul at secfence.com>; websecurity at lists.webappsec.org
> *Sent:* Sun, May 29, 2011 9:48:07 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [WEB SECURITY] Exploiting User-Agent XSS
>> Are group members aware of some technique wherein attacker would force
>> victim's browser to set some proxy temporarily which is controlled by
>> attacker only?
> If you control a proxy for HTTP traffic, why would you bother changing
> U-A on the request, instead of just grabbing the cookies or injecting
> your XSS payload into the response?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the websecurity