[WASC-WAFEC] Gartner's Magic Quadrant

Klaubert Herr da Silveira klaubert at gmail.com
Sat Jun 21 00:05:11 EDT 2014

Gartner MQ is normally high level, and wide in aspects considered (market
share, global/regional presence, and the testimonial of users about the
product and support). The product is just one of then. And I see wafec with
the potential for a technical view, that MQ don't offer. Allows the user to
a more deep technical evaluation of the products.
Be referred by Gartner will bring good exposure, no doubt.

Em 20/06/2014 19:42, "Christian Heinrich" <christian.heinrich at cmlh.id.au>

> Since the Gartner Magic Quadrant I believe we should include
> consideration of http://blogs.gartner.com/adam-hils/tag/waf/ within
> the next release of WAFEC, specifically if there is something missing
> from WAFEC that was considered by Gartner?
> Aside from Common Criteria, the Gartner Magic Quadrant is a major
> factor in selecting a WAF product?
> This may also increase the visibility of the next release of WAFEC if
> it is cited by Gartner.
> Please let me know your thoughts?
> --
> Regards,
> Christian Heinrich
> http://cmlh.id.au/contact
> _______________________________________________
> wasc-wafec mailing list
> wasc-wafec at lists.webappsec.org
> http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/wasc-wafec_lists.webappsec.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webappsec.org/pipermail/wasc-wafec_lists.webappsec.org/attachments/20140621/c310a91e/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the wasc-wafec mailing list