[WASC-WAFEC] Proposed "Conflict of Interest" Section?
ofer at shezaf.com
Sun Jul 28 01:25:12 EDT 2013
This is a community project: people will always have a day job and a night
job and they are never completely separated. As long as we keep transparency
and open review to everyone, listed or not, and I believe your pointers
shows that we do, we are OK and I will not add such a "warning".
From: wasc-wafec [mailto:wasc-wafec-bounces at lists.webappsec.org] On Behalf
Of Christian Heinrich
Sent: 20 July 2013 03:09
To: Achim Hoffmann
Cc: wasc-wafec at lists.webappsec.org
Subject: Re: [WASC-WAFEC] Proposed "Conflict of Interest" Section?
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Achim Hoffmann <websec10 at sic-sec.org>
> just to be more precise: you mean that the "Conflict of interest"
> section points out that even the contributions are from 3 vendors, it
> has been reviewed by other (ca. 5) vendors. So we have ca. 8 vendors in
> Sounds fair.
I count seven people at
but I may be wrong.
At first glance
appears to be dominated by a single vendor. However this is not the case
when it is considered under the context of names assigned to each section
The core issue is that of first impression of the reader and clarifying this
at the beginning of WAFECv2 would avoid their above
(incorrect) conclusion by the reader [of WAFECv2].
I'll assume it might be possible to extract the percentage of each
contributor too and if the total of these three [contributors] are lower
than that of the other four [contributors] then this metric would also be
wasc-wafec mailing list
wasc-wafec at lists.webappsec.org
More information about the wasc-wafec